Alewife numbers remain low in Lake Michigan

State fisheries officials predict salmon will be hungry and bite lures more readily with fewer alewives in Lake Michigan.  Photo: Howard Meyerson

State fisheries officials predict salmon will be hungry and bite lures more readily with fewer alewives in Lake Michigan. Photo: Howard Meyerson

By Howard Meyerson

Grand Rapids, Mich. — Researchers studying prey fish populations in Lake Michigan have found that alewife populations continue to be at low ebb and may dip further before the 2014 fishing season is over.

Surveys conducted last August by state and federal agencies found little change from 2012, when prey fish numbers were reported at all-time lows.

“Things haven’t changed much. There continues to be a relatively limited age range, and we don’t have any that are over age five,” said Dave Warner, a fisheries research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey. His crew, along with those from Michigan’s DNR and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, conducted acoustic and mid-depth netting surveys on Lake Michigan.

What was found was a “very low abundance” of new alewives, referred to as “age zero,” while the volume of older fish was comparable to 2012.


State fisheries managers plan to monitor anglers’ catches this year. Michigan and other Lake Michigan states cut chinook stocking by 50 percent in 2013 to conserve alewives. They hoped to avoid a salmon population collapse like the one in Lake Huron in 2003-04.

“Right now we have a pretty typical spread of salmon year-classes out in the lake,” said Jay Wesley, the southern Lake Michigan fisheries supervisor for the DNR. “There are mostly 2- and 3-year-olds, and that is what people catch.

“The alewife forecast is not really great. We seem to be living off the 2010 and 2012 year-classes, and the 2013 year-class is not really special.”

Any effect from the stocking cut won’t be seen until 2015, according to Wesley. Meanwhile, Michigan will stock 559,000 chinook salmon come May. Anglers will be able to catch and keep five salmon per day during the 2014 fishing season.

Warner said the August surveys found 29.6 kilotons of prey fish in Lake Michigan. Most all of it was alewives. Bloater chub and smelt numbers were down from previous years. Young-of-the-year alewives, the age zero fish, also were not as prevalent.

“It was a weak year-class (2013); there were far fewer of them,” Warner said. “That’s different from last year when we saw widespread distribution of age zero fish. One implication of that is we predict the alewife biomass in fall of 2014 will be lower than in 2013, and that’s not great.”


Age structure is another concern for researchers. Lake Michigan, as recently as 2007, had alewives that were 7, 8, and 9 years old. Older alewives produce more eggs than younger ones. That “truncation” of the age structure is likely having some effect, Warner said. He and others suspect there are no older alewives because they are heavily preyed upon by chinook salmon, which “eat, first and foremost, the largest alewives.”

Why the alewives congregate in certain areas of the lake is an unknown at this time. Where they school appears to vary from year to year. More research is planned to examine those patterns.

“What we see on the (2013) map is the highest alewife concentrations tend be in shallow waters close to shore,” Warner said. “In 2012 they were more evenly distributed because we had an average year-class, still billions of fish, and they were more or less everywhere. When we have a strong year-class, they show up all over the place, but when we have a weak year-class the distribution is much patchier.”

Salmon may congregate where alewife populations are heaviest, but that may be little help for anglers. Salmon are less likely to bite if they are filled up with alewives, according to Warner.

Wesley agrees. He expects anglers will catch more salmon than last year, but the fish are likely to be smaller.

“We expect the size will be down, but the catch rate will be better. They will be hungry and hitting lures more,” Wesley said. “We typically see catch rates go up when the amount of biomass goes down.”


© 2014 Howard Meyerson

This story appears in Michigan Outoor News

About Howard Meyerson

After more than 30 years in the outdoor writing business, you would think I'd know better.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s